What is a Cyber Incident Exercising?
Cyber incident exercising is the process of practising cyber response techniques against potential threats in a safe and simulated environment.
The purpose of cyber incident exercising is to prepare cyber security teams for real threat scenarios, where response time is critical.
Its tactics and techniques can be used to establish current organisational practices and formulate an incident response plan (IRP) - or to evaluate the effectiveness of an existing IRP.
The Importance of Cyber Incident Exercising
Our cyber incident exercise service is recommended for any organisation looking to upskill and optimise their cyber security team’s ability and preparedness to handle the latest threats.
In the unfortunate event of a breach, well-practised teams can communicate, respond and remediate the threat effectively to minimise the impact. Several key benefits include:
- Cross-team Coordination: Bridewell’s cyber incident exercising service incorporates multiple departments, from IT to legal and communications. During incident response situations, your teams will gain necessary insight into each role and work collaboratively.
- Realistic Scenarios: Roleplaying scenarios suggested by our cyber incident exercising team are based on threats your organisation faces, updated with current industry trends. This is done to provide a realistic environment in which to pressure test your team.
- Identify Gaps in Security: With Bridewell’s cyber incident exercising service, you’ll be able to review team performance in simulations, so you can spot and amend any gaps in team coordination.
What to Expect from Cyber Incident Exercising with Bridewell
Our cyber incident exercising service is designed to prepare your organisation for an effective response against cyber attacks.
It replicates the realistic scenarios your organisation might face. So, key staff know their roles and responsibilities when a live incident occurs. This means less time speculating and more time responding in the face of a real attack.
The key components of our cyber incident exercising service include:
Realistic Simulations
Cyber incident exercising offers tailored simulations that imitate a real cyber attack. This is based on risks, vulnerabilities, and industry threats, to make the simulation highly relevant to a specific organisation. These attacks can range from ransomware to data breaches or insider threats. The aim is to challenge your organisation’s response capabilities and pressure test your team to identify gaps in your remediation process.
Team Involvement
Bridewell’s cyber incident exercising service incorporates members from various departments, including IT, security, communications and legal. This helps ensure that everyone within your organisation is coordinated in its approach to cyber threats.
Cyber Live Play Exercises
Bridewell’s Live Play exercises emulate an adversary incident as a trigger event - adding realism that goes beyond the boardroom table. Technical Live Play is based on your organisation’s threat landscape and uses MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques to develop incident escalation. Executive Live Play focuses on senior decision-making, leadership response and communication in the event of a live attack.
Tactical Guidance
Bridewell’s cyber security experts provide tactical guidance in real-time, offering advice and helping teams understand best practices and improve response strategies.
Debrief and Improvement Plans
Our team of experts will provide a debrief and feedback post-simulation to help break down gaps in team performance and provide actionable plans for improvements going forward.
Learn more about our Incident Response Services
If you require a cyber incident exercising service, speak with one of our team to see how we can support.
Our client, a global hyperscaler, chose to partner with us to address these challenges, with the aim of delivering integrated compliance and risk management solutions, focusing on access management, vendor assessments, and US Government audit readiness.
Cable System Access: Automated Management for Security and Compliance
Subsea cable system operators based out of the US need to comply with National Security Agreements (NSAs) that restrict access to sensitive subsea cable facilities, systems and information, requiring robust controls for both physical and logical access. Cable systems, which fall under the remit of an NSA, are known as a Regulated Cable System.
Organisations and individuals, such as engineers and Network Operating Centre (NOC) analysts, who require physical and/or logical access to Regulated Cable Systems, are required to undergo a thorough screening process and are subject to approval by the US Government. This screening process is a regulatory requirement and requires annual reports to be issued to the appropriate government agencies.
Bridewell designed and implemented an automated access management system tailored to our client’s requirements. This system:
1. Centralised the database of approved personnel.
2. Automated request and approval workflows.
3. Integrated with our client’s access control hardware/software.
4. Maintained audit logs for compliance tracking.
5. Allowed a straightforward review of access control lists for each Regulated Cable System.
6. Provided expiration alerts for re-verification of access rights.
The Results
- Efficiency: Reduced manual approval times from days to hours.
- Accuracy: Automated verification minimised human error.
- Compliance: Real-time logging and reporting supported regulatory audits seamlessly.
Streamlined Vendor Assessments: Standardisation and Automation
Our client’s vendor assessment process was manual, slow, and lacked consistent risk treatment and tracking. This resulted in:
- Inconsistent risk treatment: Without standardised criteria, vendors were assessed subjectively, leading to uneven enforcement of compliance and security requirements.
- Lack of audit readiness: Without a formal assessment process, it became difficult to demonstrate due diligence during audits and apply a consistent approach.
- Regulatory misalignment: The lack of a formalised vendor risk assessment approach led to inconsistencies and differing approaches to managing key vendors supporting Regulated Cable Systems.
Bridewell developed a structured vendor tiering standard which analysed a series of inputs to determine the rigour and depth necessary to assess a vendor on an initial and ongoing basis. It also standardised physical and logical security requirements for vendors mapped to ISO 27001. The output included:
- In-depth compliance assessments based upon NSA requirements.
- Annual audits and assessments, including site visits to NOCs and Cable Landing Stations (CLSs).
- Online vendor self-assessment questionnaires.
- Automated scoring based on predefined security criteria.
- Centralised evidence submission and feedback.
The Results
- Speed: Assessment turnaround reduced from weeks to days.
- Consistency: Automated scoring ensured adherence to standards.
- Insight: Aggregated data enabled proactive risk management.
NSA Regulatory Requirements: Integrated Risk Control Framework
Our client needed to align NSA processes with a unified risk taxonomy and ensure ongoing compliance. At the time, there was no formal risk or control framework related to the design, build and operational phases of a subsea cable system.
The impacts that resulted were:
- Regulatory exposure: The hyperscaler was left exposed to compliance failure against the Regulated Cable System NSAs.
- Inconsistent risk management: The absence of standardised controls resulted in risk identification and mitigation being ad hoc and reactive, increasing the likelihood of gaps in security, access control and incident response.
- Operational vulnerabilities: Design and build phases lacked formal oversight and defined standards for control implementation, leading to inconsistent design, control implementation, potential vulnerabilities, reportable incidents and service disruptions.
Bridewell implemented a subsea cable system focused risk and control framework that aligned with the full cable system lifecycle (design, build, operate):
- Designed and implemented a subsea risk framework which aligned with the hyperscaler’s hierarchical risk taxonomy.
- Designed and implemented a subsea control framework which allocated risks to the various cross-functional teams through all phases of the cable system lifecycle, including risks relating to the physical and environmental security of CLSs and NOCs. Conducted risk and control assessments, working with cross-functional teams to address any gaps and areas for improvement.
- Automated and digitised the risk and control frameworks and assessment through the deployment of specialist Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) tooling.
- Implemented governance through a formalised risk and compliance committee.
The Results
- Consistency: Single methodology for risk and control ownership, identification and mitigation.
- Visibility: Centralised documentation improved audit readiness.
Managing US Government Audits: Proactive Readiness
Subsea cable operators are subject to rigorous and recurring audits by US Government agencies to verify compliance with mitigation instruments such as NSAs and other regulatory frameworks. These audits assess not only technical and operational controls but also governance, documentation, and vendor oversight across the entire cable system lifecycle.
Such audits involve the gathering of an enormous amount of evidence, not just across the internal operational teams, but also with all the relevant vendors who manage, support, monitor and maintain the Principal Equipment across the Regulated Cable System infrastructure.
Operators must maintain comprehensive records of access, vendor assessments, incident response plans and physical security measures – failure to produce timely and accurate documentation during audits can result in non-compliance findings, triggering remediation orders or penalties.
Bridewell leveraged the subsea cable system risk and control frameworks to conduct regular “mock audits”, simulating government audit tasks. This process included:
- Evidence gathering.
- Policy and documentation review.
- Deep-dive control assessment.
- Report writing with mitigation plans.
- Follow-up actions.
The Results
- Readiness: Identified and closed gaps before formal audits, easing the process for the live audit with the regulators.
- Risk reduction: Enhanced preparedness and reduced audit-related risks, providing confidence.
Conclusion
As a trusted partner, Bridewell delivered a comprehensive governance framework that transformed risk management and regulatory compliance for subsea cable operations. Key outcomes included:
- Reduced administrative overhead.
- Increased process efficiency.
- Enhanced audit preparedness.
- Increased confidence.
- Strengthened operational security.
These initiatives significantly improved the hyperscaler’s security and compliance posture, ensuring uninterrupted global connectivity and adherence to stringent regulatory requirements.
Global Hyperscaler
Industry
Cyber Incident Exercising FAQs
Incident response exercising should be conducted regularly, for example annually or biannually, depending on your risk profile and requirements. It should also be undertaken when significant updates or changes are made to your cyber security infrastructure. This could be through new staff, systems or identified threats.
Tabletop exercising and live play are both cyber incident tactics designed to assess and develop an organisation’s cyber readiness. But they differ in their approach.
A tabletop exercise, as its name suggests, is based in the boardroom. It involves walking teams through potential scenarios and helping them understand their roles and responsibilities as incidents escalate. This can be valuable in building confidence and understanding in a workshop environment.
Live play goes one step further by simulating a real attack to trigger a cyber incident. The main benefit of live play is the ability to pressure-test individuals in a realistic attack scenario.
Live play and red teaming are both cyber security tactics used to test a team’s ability to effectively respond to threats.
Red teaming aims to test an organisation’s ability to detect and manage attacks by simulating an attempt to hack or compromise the IT environment. It aims to evaluate threat prevention and spot gaps in defences.
Live play is instead focused on testing the organisation’s response once an incident has already occurred. It focuses on response effectiveness – how teams communicate and ultimately remediate a live, escalating incident.
Why Us?
Awards
Our team have won numerous industry awards, including 'Cyber Security Company of the Year' at the Cyber Security Awards 2026 and Best Cyber Security Service Provider' at the Cyber Security Awards 2025.
Certifications
Our people and services are highly accredited by leading industry bodies including CREST, the NCSC, and more. Our SOC holds extensive accreditations from CREST (including for CSIR and SOC2) and works closely with our cyber consultancy services.
Partnerships
As a Microsoft Partner, we also hold advanced specialisms in Cloud Security and Threat Protection. We’ve also implemented some of the UK’s largest deployments of the Microsoft Security stack, inc. Sentinel, Defender, Purview and more.